HomeMy WebLinkAboutsipp-forum-dr-perissinotto-loneliness-falls-2023ADDRESSING LONELINESS
AND ISOLATION MEDICALLY AND WITH A PUBLIC HEALTH LENS
March 2023
Carla Perissinotto, MD, MHS
Professor of Medicine
Division of Geriatrics
University of California San Francisco
Associate Medical Director
Vitas Healthcare
2
OBJECTIVES
4 cases to contextualize how loneliness and isolation present in different medical settingsDiscuss
Why loneliness and isolation should be viewed as a public health issue and something we as individuals cannot ignoreUnderstand
Identify tools and frameworks to begin to imagine solutionsIdentify
4 CASES
MAN, 93, WHO FROZE TO DEATH HAD RECEIVED HEAT SHUT-OFF NOTICES
Bay City, Michigan Thursday, February 19, 2009 :
Public records show a 93-year-old man found frozen to
death in his Michigan home had received several utility
shut-off notices… six letters were sent to Marvin Schur's
home in the past two years. His body was found Jan. 17,
several days after Bay City Electric Light & Power
restricted electricity and a month after his final shut-off
notice. Records suggest Schur was confused about how
to pay. He tried at least twice to pay bills at his bank,
which couldn't accept them.
See also Widera JAMA 2011
JOHN, 82, STUCK AT HOME POST-COVID
homebound since Dec 2020. Had COVID
and fell
Stairs getting into home
Live in an ethnically marginalized
and”unsafe” neighborhood
has family nearby
Has been dismissed from many practices for
“inappropriate behavior”
Recently described himself as “socially
isolated”
Has a landline and basic cell phone.
Does not want to be bothered by any other
technology
MEL, 94, DYING OF CANCER
Jewish, European Refugee
Lives in assisted living that caters to people
of a different heritage
Identifies as Atheist, and some describe him
as a Holocaust survivor
Doesn’t participate in activities but enjoys
religious conversation
Hearing Impaired
English is his second language
Requests Aid in Dying
GIANNA, 2.5 Y, BORN IN A PANDEMIC
Born July 2020
Limited social contact initially
Met family and friends to prioritize
socialization
Raised in a bilingual and multicultural family
Day care 3 times a week
Intergenerational home with nanny twice a
week
Recently traveled to visit friends and family
in Italy for the first time
E: Educate
A: Assess
R: Respond
E: EDUCATE
ESTIMATING HEALTH RISK
LONELINESS AND ISOLATION IN THE CONTEXT OF SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH (SDOH)
Gottlieb, UCSF Presentation
2017
CONTEXT: ESTIMATING HEALTH RISKS
If you were Mr. Schur’s medical provider, or health system leader, or
bank teller: how do you estimate health risks, and how do you help?
1.Cognitive
Impairment
2. Mobility?
3. Social Isolation?
CONTEXT: ESTIMATING HEALTH RISKS
If you were John’s medical provider, or health system leader, policy
maker, or neighbor: how do you estimate health risks, and how do you
help?
1.COVID-19
2. Arthritis
3. Constipation
4. FALLS*
5. Social Isolation
6. Loneliness
7.Mobility
8.Tech Access
9.“Inappropriate
Behavior”
CONTEXT: ESTIMATING HEALTH RISKS
How do you think about Mel who is nearing the end of life?
1.Cancer
2. Limited Mobility
3. Hearing*
5. Social Isolation
6.Loneliness
7.Living situation
8.Trauma/refugee/survivor
CONTEXT: ESTIMATING HEALTH RISKS
If you were Gianna’s medical provider, or health system leader, or her
parent: how do you estimate health risks, ensure she has dignity,
longevity and how do you help?
RISKS:
1.Pandemic Baby
2.Limited Exposure to infectious
diseases
3.2nd generation American*
4.Latina
5.Lives in an “unsafe” neighborhood
Protective Factors:
1.Intergenerational home
2.2nd generation American*
3.Prioritize socialization
DEFINING SOCIAL
DETERIMINANTS OF
HEALTH
Social Connections,
Loneliness and Isolation
16
HOW DO WE DEFINE LONELINESS?
Cacioppo. U. Chicago 2009
Loneliness is the subjective feeling of
being alone
“the distress that results
from discrepancies between ideal and
perceived social relationships.”
LONELINESS OR ISOLATION?
Loneliness Social isolation
Subjective:feeling isolated Objective: being isolated
Mismatch between actual and desired social
relationships (*quality*)Low levels of social contact (*quantity*)
Unpleasant Need not be unpleasant
Low sense of control or choice May be chosen: “solitude”
Loneliness
"Subjective" assessment that social
relationships are lacking.
-Unpleasant
“Quality”
Social isolation
"Objective" measure of connections to family, friends, or the community
-not necessarily unpleasant
“Quantity”
Social Disconnection
Emotional Functional Structural
R<0.20
Figure from Dr. Ashwin Kotwal
Cornwell EY, Waite LJ. 2009;64(suppl_1):i38-i46
Intersection of Loneliness and Isolation
Loneliness
43% “Occasionally Lonely”
10% “Frequently Lonely”
Social isolation
20% Socially Isolated
11% Severely Isolatedr<0.2
Perissinotto, Carla M., Irena Stijacic Cenzer, and Kenneth E. Covinsky. "Loneliness in older persons: a predictor of functional decline and death." Archives of internal
medicine 172.14 (2012): 1078-1084.
Cudjoe, Thomas KM, David L. Roth, Sarah L. Szanton, Jennifer L. Wolff, Cynthia M. Boyd, and Roland J. Thorpe Jr. "The epidemiology of social isolation: National
health and aging trends study." The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 75, no. 1 (2020): 107-113.
A: ASSESS
MEASUREMENT Who is at risk
IDENTIFYING LONELINESS AND SOCIAL ISOLATION
NO “gold Standard”
Multiple different measurement tools
All scales have benefits and drawbacks
Most developed for research purposes
Little validation for clinical use
Some of the most commonly used:
UCLA-3
Lubben Social Network Scale
Duke Social Support Index (DSSI)
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
Cornwell
HOW DO WE MEASURE LONELINESS?
Question Hardly Ever Some of the
Time Often
1. I feel left out 1 2 3
2. I feel isolated 1 2 3
3. I lack
companionship 1 2 3
UCLA Loneliness Scale
▪Original scale has 20 items. 3 most frequently used
▪Single Item question: “How often do you feel lonely?”
-Kotwal et al. 2022 https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.17700
Hughes, Waite, Hawkley, & Cacioppo 2004. “A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys.” Research on Aging: 26(6):655-672.
THE INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
•Recommends the inclusion of the Berkman-Syme Index
in electronic medical records
The Berkman-Syme Social Network Index (SNI) is a self-reported questionnaire for use in
adults aged 18–64 years old that is a composite measure of four types of social
connections:
-marital status (married vs. not)
-sociability (number and frequency of contacts with children,
close relatives, and close friends)
-church group membership (yes vs. no)
-membership in other community organizations (yes vs. no)
**SNI categorize into four levels of social connection: socially isolated,moderately
isolated; moderately integrated; and socially integrated.
RISK FACTORS Who is at risk
“THE IRONY OF LONELINESS
IS WE ALL FEEL ITAT THE SAME TIME
-TOGETHER”
Rupi Kaur, “the sun and her
flowers”
LOSSES PREDICT INCREASES IN LONELINESS AT THE LEVEL OF THE INDIVIDUAL (AND ISOLATION)
Death of spouse Death or other loss of relatives, friends
Change in living arrangements (less likely to be living with others)
Institutionalization
Deteriorating physical health Impairment of mobility
Impairment of vision and/or hearing
Reduced social activity
Aartsen & Jylhä, 2011; Dykstra et al., 2005; Newall, Chipperfield & Bailis, 2014; Nicolaisen &
Thorsen, 2014; Tijhuis et al., 1999; Victor & Bowling, 2012; Wenger & Burholt, 2004
Younger Person: Functional Domains
Medical
Cognitive/
Emotional
Environmental
Familial/
Social
Financial
FUNCTION
Pacala, JT. Grand Rounds UCSF 2011
Multiple Chronic Diseases
+
Problems in Other Domains
=
Functional Decline
The Challenge of Complexity:
Older Person: Functional Domains
Cognitive/
Emotional
Environmental
Familial/
Social
Medical
Financial
FUNCTION
WHERE BREAKDOWNS HAPPEN:
Assume all adults are the same
Create systems that cater to younger adults and expect everyone else to adapt
Focus only on the “medical”
Do not recognize heterogeneity of aging
Do not understand decreased physiological reserve in aging
Failure to recognize this:
FUNCTION
SERIOUS ILLNESS
WHY SHOULD WE CARE ABOUT THESE TOPICS IN THE LAST YEARS OF LIFE?
Steinhauser, K. E., Christakis, N. A., Clipp, E. C., McNeilly, M., McIntyre, L., & Tulsky, J. A. (2000). Factors considered important at the end of life
by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. Jama, 284(19), 2476-2482.
•Individuals and family members care about social needs
•“Have someone who will listen” -99%
•“Share time with close friends” -85-91%
•“Presence of family” -81-95%
•“Be able to help others” -88%
•Individuals may be less able to cope with loneliness
•Socially isolation may become more common and impact quality of life and health care
SERIOUSLY ILL OLDER ADULTS
Nearly 4 in 5 older adults are lonely
(79%)
Social Isolation
doubles in the last 6
months of life (34%)
Kotwal, A. et al. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 69(11). (2021): 3081-3091.
*Adjusted for time before death, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education
**Spouses of patients with dementia have HIGHER levels of loneliness and depression
OLDER ADULTS WITH COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN THE LAST 4 YEARS OF LIFE
Kotwal, A. et al. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 69, no. 11 (2021): 3081-3091.
36
Subgroups at Risk for Loneliness
*Adjusted for time before death, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education
Kotwal, A. Cenzer, I., Perissinotto, C., Yaffe, K., Smith, A. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2022.
At the end of life,
socially isolated older
adults with cognitive
impairment have:
-Lower Hospice Use
-Lower end-of-life
acute care (ED,
hospital stays, ICU
stays)
CONTEXT: MEL’S RISKS
Older
Terminal Illness
Homebound
He is losing mobility
He has hearing impairment
He is incontinent
He is an immigrant
English is not his first language
He has experienced Trauma, and is a
survivor
ISOLATION DURING COVID -19
Kotwal, A., Perissinotto, C et al. 2020.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
HEALTH EFFECTS Understanding
the risks
▪National survey of 1604 adults aged >60 followed for 6 years
▪Asked if they were lonely -UCLA Loneliness Scale
-classified as lonely if responded “some of the time or often to any of the 3 questions”
▪Outcomes:
-Death-Decline in Function
▪Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)
▪Other mobility tasks
Perissinotto C. JAMA (Archives) Internal Medicine 2012
July 23, 2012
Loneliness in Older Persons: A Predictor of Functional Decline and Death
Carla Perissinotto, MD, MHS, Irena Cenzer, MA, Kenneth Covinsky, MD, MPH
STUDY CONCLUSIONS
▪Loneliness is common
▪It is an independent predictor of functional decline
(59% increased risk)
▪It is an independent predictor of death (45%
increased risk)
■6500 men and women over 7 years
■Mortality higher in socially isolated AND lonely
April 9, 2013
Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older
men and women
Andrew Steptoe, Aparna Shankar, Panayotes Demakakos, and Jane Wardle
In 2020, still see worse health outcomes
in adults with BOTH loneliness and
isolation
September 7, 2021
Association of Social Isolation with Disability Burden and 1-Year
Mortality Among Older Adults with Critical Illness
Jason R. Falvey, PT, DPT, PhD1; Andrew B. Cohen, MD, DPhil2; John R. O’Leary, MA2; Linda Leo-Summers, MPH2; Terrence E. Murphy, PhD2; Lauren E. Ferrante, MD, MHS3
▪997 older adults hospitalized in
the ICU
▪Each 1 point increase on the
social isolation score:
•7% increase in disability
count
•14% increase in mortality
LONELINESS AND PHYSICAL & PSYCHOLOGICAL SYMPTOMS
▪Lonely older adults experience higher rates of:
▪pain
▪Anxiety
▪Depression
▪and insomnia
Kotwal, A. Steinman, M., Cenzer, I., Smith, A 2021. JAMA Internal Medicine
HEALTH EFFECTS
May be harmful at any age, and likely worse for older adults.
Social isolation and loneliness are associated with:
▪Worsened heart disease
▪Worse control of diabetes
▪Poor Sleep and depression
▪Increased Dementia risk
▪Frailty and functional decline
▪HIGHER health care costs
▪Increased mortality
Feb 3, 2017
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE OLDER?
Physiologic age more
important than
chronological age
Not just age but
comorbidity, functional
loss, frailty
Singh M et al. Mayo Clin Proc.
2008;83:1146-1153
R: RESPONDTRANSLATING FINDINGS TO PRACTICE
The role of social prescribing
SOCIAL ISOLATION AND
LONELINESS IN OLDER
ADULTS:
OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
RECOMMENDATIONS
Develop a more robust evidence base
Translate current research into health care practices
Improve awareness
Strengthen ongoing education and training
Strengthen ties between the health care system and community-based networks and resources
POPULATION
LEVEL
FRAMEWORK
Primary Prevention: Identify people at risk for loneliness and Isolation
Women, lower SES, older, LGBTQ
Recent losses
Secondary Prevention: decrease the consequences for those who are lonely and or isolated
Requires screening
Knowing which interventions work Isolated
Disconnecting
At Risk
AARP Public Policy Institute 2018; Flowers et al., 2017; Shaw et al., 2017;
COSTS: $6.7 billion every year
$1,608/person/year
THE ROLE OF SOCIAL
PRESCRIBRIBING
TIME TO BENEFIT
How long do we have to
experience loneliness
before we see the
negative health effects?
Or
Can we reduce the risk
of negative
consequences?
AND
How can we proactively
protect our health
LESSONS LEARNED: SOCIAL PRESCRIPTIONS
1. FOCUS on
CONNECTION
2.AND talk about other
health risks
3. Advanced care
planning
1.Who do I focus on
2.What are the risks
3.What am I treating
4.Why am I treating
5.For how long
6.Who else can help
55
Framework for clinical interventions
a.Direct interventions: Social support, enhancing interactions,
address maladaptive cognition
b.Indirect interventions: Vision & Hearing, Functional Needs
c.Downstream consequences: Early Advanced care planning,
Address related Symptoms (pain, depression, trauma)
Policy changes which incentivize addressing social needs
Mann et al. 2017 Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
DIRECT: OPPORTUNITIES FOR SOCIAL CONNECTIONS
▪Community-based programs
▪Peer support programs
▪Telephone Support
▪“without walls programs”
▪Foundation for Art and Healing
▪Caregiver support
Kotwal et al. 2021. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Social Skills, Social Support
IS TECH THE
SOLUTION?
CONNECTIVITY GAPS INTERSECT WITH OTHER FACTORS
•Older adults with low educational
attainment (less than a high school
degree) and incomes below
$25,000 are 10X more likely to be
offline
•Ethnicity is a major factor
•Health status
•Geography
Broadband gap varies widely by state
Source: Aging Connected report, OATS and the Humana
Foundation (January 2021)
VIRTUAL CONNECTIONS ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR IN-
PERSON INTERACTIONS
Hawkley, L., Finch, L., Kotwal, A., Waite, L. 2021. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IN SUMMARY
ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2208029
WHAT TO DO WHEN EVIDENCE IS LIMITED
1.
INDIVIDUALIZE
2. TALK
ABOUT IT
3. THINK
CREATIVELY
•Strategies for Individuals
•Strategies at the population level
REVISITING OUR CASES: INDIVIDUAL VS. POPULATION
•Where did he get missed, or forgotten?
•Is addressing the structural environment the answer?
•Can addressing his “challenging behaviors” help?
•Can we change his life course?
65
IN SUMMARY
We defined loneliness and social isolation and framed them in case studies
We examined how loneliness and isolation are linked to serious illness, cognitive impairment, and the COVID-19 pandemic
We applied a public health perspective to understand interventions and solutions
We identified examples of evidence based solutions
We talked about the unique needs of people with life limiting illness
We ARE connecting with each other TODAY
THANK YOU!
66